Many gaming companies have recognized the importance of culture, not only for attracting and retaining top talents but also for accelerating and boosting their overall performance.1 In the process of defining and crafting their culture, however, many organizations painfully search for the optimal culture. Particularly data-driven, computation-intense industries like gaming implicitly nurture the notion that culture is yet another optimization problem with a computable, linear solution. Yet, culture considered in isolation is nothing but the most basic interpretation of “the way we do things around here”. The most successful industry players perfectly weed strategy and culture to the external environment. They have, in other words, a harmonious ensemble of:
Strategy
Culture
Context
Few companies, however, make a genuine effort to meticulously define their envisioned culture, not to mention consider the holistic interplay of the three dimensions. Companies must work hard to flesh out their ambition along the three interrelated dimensions of defining whom to personify, what goals to pursue, and which external factors to consider. That is exceptionally challenging for an industry that – qua its scope and influence – actively shapes the external context. Particularly financially successful gaming companies that have enabled and shaped the recent industry surge are sometimes reluctant to revise and adjust their seemingly perfect ways of working, falling prey to the gravestone cliché “that’s how we’ve always done it”. Defining, evolving, and maintaining culture is a laborious, sometimes painful process, primarily when old, deep-rooted behaviors are abandoned and supplanted by new ones. Without an adequate conceptualization of culture, many executives are seduced to focus exclusively on familiar topics such as strategy and context.
Undeniably, accurately evaluating organizational culture is a massive, often underestimated challenge. Much of what defines culture is obscured, and the visible relics merely represent the figurative tip of the iceberg. Yet, culture, as theorized by Schein (2010), comprises everything from observable artifacts to existential beliefs and assumptions.
Working with a colorful bouquet of international organizations, we realized that the recurring behaviors in a work-related context are generally the best approximation of culture, implicitly reflecting people’s underlying assumptions. Following the groundbreaking work of Prof. Charles O’Reilly and his extensively validated Organizational Culture Profile, those observable behaviors can be conceptualized along eight dimensions:
Achieving
Thorough
Customer Centric
Collaborative
Employee-oriented
Transparent
Adaptable
Principled
In short, organizational culture arises from the interplay of the eight dimensions of O’Reilly’s Culture Profile. The variety and diversity of company cultures, in turn, emanates from the specific manifestation of each dimension relative to the others. And while all dimensions appear equally essential, companies must prioritize, accepting the inherent tradeoffs that accompany each decision. The advantageousness of any dimension, for instance, heavily depends on the larger culture – that is, the manifestation of the other seven dimensions. Adaptability, often seen as the holy grail of organizational design, especially in agile gaming companies, can prompt chaotic, unpredictable behaviors if not balanced appropriately. Ultimately, each company has its unique cultural signature, reflecting its core values and beliefs, its existential attitudes, and its formal and informal institutions.
Despite the enormity of this undertaking, companies can break free from the chains of their operational heritage. Just like strategy is a permanent guest in executive boards, culture, too, should have a regular seat at the table in executive boardrooms. Indeed, leaders that deliberately devote time and energy to the initially obscure and outwardly unstructured world of culture, can, with the right tools, create a lasting competitive advantage by neatly aligning strategy and culture to the external circumstances. Ultimately, under the artful leadership of their skilled executives, gaming companies can envision, implement, and hone their desired culture, setting off to new horizons.